.A lot has been written over the years about how to choose a fighting arts instructor and
what to look for in a school. What about the art or method itself? Let's presume that your
purpose for studying a fighting art is, well, learning how to fight.You can call it self
defense or anything else but the bottom line is this. If your goal is to develop skills to deal
with unpleasant people doing unacceptable things to you and yours, you're going to fight.
Exercise, tournament trophies, spiritual enlightenment or just having fun may be part of
the program but the goal is fighting. Now that we've established that we can probably
rule out a lot of martial arts schools. Most, like it or not, are geared for the
sport/tournament scene. This isn't necessarily a bad thing but it may not be where you
want to go. I've been in studios/dojo/dojang where if you want to advance you have to
compete in a tournament. When asked why the sensei/instructor/grand pubah said "The
stress of competing in a tournament will teach to deal with the stress of a street attack". I
thought the guy was kidding at first. No, gentle reader, he was 100% serious. Folks, I've
done both and I'll tell you this, the only kind of stress that tournaments train you to deal
with is, tournaments. Even with a full contact match you have training time, you know
when and where the fight will be and there are agreed upon rules. Thinking this will help
you prepare for the pucker factor that occurs during a barfight, a car jacking attempt or
someone trying to stab you while you're minding your own business, not bothering a soul
is nothing short of fantasy land, presuming you even see it coming. All I could do was
shake my head and walk away.
Anyway, what art or method do you train in? If the only places to train are sport
oriented schools are you out of luck? What about tapes and books? More importantly,
Which ones? Do you go with the latest "Killer SF/SEAL Hand to Hand Method"
advertised in whatever martial arts magazine you choose to read? How about the
thousand year old, battle field proven methods used by the invincible (fill in the blank)
warriors who protected the ancient kingdom/province/region of (fill in the blank)? (One
question, if these guys are invincible how come the kingdom isn't around anymore?)
Let's see if we can come up with some guidelines to give you a better learning curve,
waste less time and save you some hard earned money.
First, attitude is everything. In spite of what I said earlier, you can get some benefit
from a sport oriented school, if you have the right attitude. You can pick up the basics as
far as striking and kicking in a relatively short time. You must, however, take a 'jutsu'
approach to your training. Major Forrest Morgan did an excellent job of putting this idea
into print in his book "Living the Martial Way". The approach is, in a nutshell, you
always train with an opponent in mind, period. Forget trophies, the goal is to prevail.
Work against partners who will attack you seriously and develop a winning (not whining)
attitude.
Second, know the kind of art you are looking at. In my opinion (and remember this is
all my opinion) you can sort the various fighting arts into three distinct categories. The
first requires the student to mold himself to the art. He must perform exactly as his
teacher does. If self defense is actually taught you are generally told "If your attacker does
'A' you will do 'B', if he does 'C' you will do 'D'". These arts are martial ways. Their
purpose is primarily to improve the individual. Self defense/survival is a secondary or
tertiary goal. They try to improve the inner man by encouraging perfect technique. Good
form is important and you will learn it in this type of art. It may, however, take you
awhile to develop solid skills that will work in the street. The second type of art is
descended from the martial ways and is primarily concerned with the sporting aspects and
competition. Their goal is to win trophies and/or prize money. Sparring is emphasized. If
self defense techniques are taught they are usually done with an eye to winning a trophy.
That means they will be eye catching, flashy and athletic, but perhaps not the most
practical thing to use when it's for real. Those reading this that are old enough can
remember when kata competition was not a musical/gymnastics number. The kata were
done as they were first designed to be done, now they may be more crowd pleasing but
any value that could be gotten has been tossed aside in the pursuit of a trophy. Self
defense competition in the tournaments I've seen recently is following this same path.
The final type of art is the conceptual methods. I've experienced two types of conceptual
teaching. The first throws multiple options for dealing with attacks at the student. He is
free to use whatever works for his physio/psychological make up. He is also encouraged
to improvise. Some of this seems to fly in the face of current research. The fewer choices
you have the quicker you can make them so the thinking and research goes. However,
what happens with this type of training is that the student is taught to do SOMETHING.
In a real attack, the worst thing you can do is nothing. A quick, violent reaction will at the
least buy you a second or two to escape or break the attack and mount your own counter.
Concepts of motion are taught through the techniques and not usually talked about. The
second type of conceptual teaching runs the student through developmental drills to build
the 'do SOMETHING' reflex. The difference is that the concepts of motion are taught
intellectually as well as through the physical techniques. You will normally find the
conceptual models taught in arts that are more 'tribal' in nature. They generally have a
very sharp learning curve when it comes to being able to learn useable skills. A final
benefit is that once a student has internalized a concept he can apply it on a broad scale.
Musashi wrote of this in the Go Rin No Sho "The principle of strategy is having one
thing, to know ten thousand things".
Train hard, train smart, stay safe.